Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,189 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natalie Akane Newcomb results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Halo Effect , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 420 hits . Analysis detected 3,946 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,558 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 43% (3,810 of 6,629 authors). This Natalie Akane Newcomb is better (less manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group. Natalie Akane Newcomb
Author details
Total words: 4,558
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.5% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.7% 1.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 9.2%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Red Herring: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst