Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 994 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KUOW Staff results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 1,472 hits . Analysis detected 10,780 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,712 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 54% (2,959 of 6,382 authors). This KUOW Staff is worse (more manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group. KUOW Staff
Author details
Total words: 8,712
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.6% percentile 2.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.9% 16.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.0% 12.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 5.5% 5.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst