Keyword summary
62% 10 analyzed articles/videos 12,451 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abraham Lincoln results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 4,693 hits . Analysis detected 36,056 faulty-reasoning hits from 47,213 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (34,724 of 37,536 keywords). This Abraham Lincoln is better (less manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group. Abraham Lincoln
Keyword details
Total words: 47,213
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score10 analyzed articles47.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst