Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,181 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeffrey H. Anderson results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Confirmation Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 710 hits . Analysis detected 5,186 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,724 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,824 of 6,628 authors). This Jeffrey H. Anderson is worse (more manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group. Jeffrey H. Anderson
Author details
Total words: 4,724
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.4% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.8% 9.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 15.0% 15.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 15.0%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Author 9.8%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst