Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 974 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joshua Claybourn results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Hindsight Bias , and Indoctrination , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 321 hits . Analysis detected 2,829 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,896 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,681 of 6,628 authors). This Joshua Claybourn is better (less manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group. Joshua Claybourn
Author details
Total words: 3,896
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.4% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.3% 5.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst