Author summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,675 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marielle Segarra results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Indoctrination , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 2,602 hits . Analysis detected 17,196 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,647 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 33% (4,493 of 6,628 authors). This Marielle Segarra is better (less manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group. Marielle Segarra
Author details
Total words: 18,647
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles18.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.6% 3.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 13.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Author 7.8%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst