Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,935 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Malaka Gharib results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 1,660 hits. Analysis detected 8,513 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,759 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,232 of 6,497 authors). This Malaka Gharib is worse (more manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Malaka Gharib
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
51%Malaka Gharib (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,759
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

50% percentile
025507510050.3% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.7%13.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 21.4%21.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.7%2.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 13.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 21.4%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate