Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 523 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lennon Sherburne results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Status Quo Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 245 hits . Analysis detected 1,445 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,046 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of 90% (712 of 6,628 authors). This Lennon Sherburne is worse (more manipulative) than 89.30% of the peer group. Lennon Sherburne
Author details
Total words: 1,046
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.3% percentile 6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 20.6% 20.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Author 6.4% 6.4% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.1% 6.1% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 23.4%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Author 20.6%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Nature: Author 6.4%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 6.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst