NPR84%

Want to improve your agility? Try these 'explosive power' exercises 5%

By Marielle Segarra0% Clare Marie Schneider0% Margaret Cirino0%

6/21/2026, 9:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 137 hits. Analysis detected 1,050 faulty-reasoning hits from 966 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 19.8% and a BS Rank of 5% (20,892 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 95.50% of the article peer group.

So you've heard of strength training and cardio. 
But have you heard of training for "explosive power"? 
It's the ability to rapidly generate a lot of force, says Jessica Scott, an exercise physiology researcher who has studied the effects of physical activity on different groups, including cancer patients and NASA astronauts. 
This skill helps us safely do many everyday tasks, like walking up and down the stairs or standing up from a chair, she says. 
"It's what allows you to catch yourself and not fall while walking down the sidewalk." 
You can hone your explosive power by doing exercises that combine speed and strength, like simple jumping jacks or more challenging kettlebell swings. 
Studies have shown that these exercises can improve sports performance and reduce injury. 
Explosive power is even more important as we age. 
It can help prevent falls and injuries as our muscle mass declines. 
Each year, starting around age 40, we lose 1% to 2% of our fast-twitch muscle fibers, a type of muscular cell that allows us to do these forceful movements. 
Scott, who currently works at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center as the director of its exercise oncology program, talked to Life Kit about how to incorporate explosive power movements into your workout. 
Below, she recommends a set of exercises for all fitness levels, as well as a set for those who have a solid fitness foundation. 
Our guide on form is Life Kit's own Margaret Cirino, who is a CrossFit Level 1 trainer and a former Division I rower at the University of Southern California. 
Lower-intensity exercises for all fitness levels 
These are movements you can try at home regardless of your fitness level. 
Just make sure you have full control over your movements and stop before you're fatigued or if you feel any pain. 
Do three sets of the following exercises and keep repetitions low  around three to five. 
Sit-to-stand 
How to do it: Grab a chair, bench or other sturdy platform and have a seat. 
Your feet should be hip-width apart. 
While keeping your abdominal muscles tight, stand up quickly from the chair and then slowly lower yourself back down. 
The lower the platform, the more difficult this exercise will feel. 
(See the image above for reference.) 
Elevated pushups 
How to do it: Using a platform or wall, start in an elevated plank position with your hands in line with your shoulders. 
Slowly lower your chest until it makes contact with the surface, and then quickly push away until your elbows are straight. 
Heel raises 
How to do it: Standing straight with your feet hip-width apart, quickly raise your heels, and then slowly lower them down onto the ground. 
Prioritize staying controlled and balanced through your heels. 
Higher-intensity exercises for those looking for a challenge 
Before you jump into these more intense movements, make sure you have a solid fitness foundation, Scott says. 
That's at least three months of regular aerobic exercise, like walking or cycling, as well as one to two days a week of strength training, she says. 
Once you have that baseline, Scott recommends incorporating a 20-minute explosive power session into your workout routine each week. 
She shares a suggested set of movements below. 
Do three sets of the exercises, and keep repetitions low  around three to five. 
Keep your movements short and high-quality, Scott says. 
Explosive power isn't like resistance training where you're trying to push yourself to fatigue. 
Squat jumps 
How to do it: With your feet hip-width apart and arms slightly behind your torso in a ready position, slowly lower yourself into a squat. 
Make sure your feet are flat on the ground and your chest is upright. 
Then accelerate out of the squat into a vertical jump, bringing your arms upward to generate momentum. 
Jump as high as possible with your hips fully extended. 
As you land, return back to a starting squat position to cushion your fall. 
Jumping jacks 
How to do it: Stand tall with your feet hip-width apart and arms by your sides. 
Then jump into a slightly wider stance, simultaneously bringing your arms laterally upward until they can touch overhead. 
Jump back into your starting standing position and repeat. 
Pushups 
How to do it: Begin in a tall plank position with your hands stacked directly below your shoulders. 
While keeping your elbows tucked into your sides, slowly lower your body until your chest makes contact with the ground. 
Then press against the ground and quickly return to a tall plank. 
Medicine ball slams 
How to do it: Stand tall with your feet hip-width apart and a medicine ball at your chest. 
Raise your heels while bringing the medicine ball overhead. 
Then quickly hinge at your hips and lower your arms and torso, simultaneously slamming the ball into the ground. 
Kettlebell swings 
How to do it: Stand tall with your feet hip-width apart and arms relaxed, and hold a kettlebell with both hands. 
First, hinge at your hips, bringing the kettlebell backward between your legs. 
Then quickly push your hips forward, using that momentum to swing the kettlebell upward until your arms are straight and horizontal. 
Return back to the hinge position and repeat. 
Scott says one explosive power training session per week is great for beginners. 
Then, you can build to the ideal, which is two 20-minute workouts a week. 
With time and consistent training, you might find it easier to chase after your kids, feel more steady on your feet or make some epic tennis shots. 
This story was edited by Malaka Gharib. 
The visual editor is CJ Riculan. 
We'd love to hear from you. 
Email us at LifeKit@npr.org. 
Listen to Life Kit on Apple Podcasts or Spotify, and sign up for our newsletter. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.9%Marielle Segarra: 2.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.4%Confirmation Bias2.9%This article: 12.4%Marielle Segarra: 2.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.6%Anchoring Bias12.4%This article: 2.3%Marielle Segarra: 2.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.8%Availability Heuristic2.3%This article: 3.6%Marielle Segarra: 2.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic3.6%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 8.1%Marielle Segarra: 2.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.4%Overconfidence Bias8.1%This article: 5.9%Marielle Segarra: 7.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 11.1%Framing Effect5.9%This article: 2.2%Marielle Segarra: 1.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Loss Aversion2.2%This article: 1.9%Marielle Segarra: 3.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Status Quo Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.1%Marielle Segarra: 4.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.4%Optimism Bias6.1%This article: 0.9%Marielle Segarra: 0.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%Pessimism Bias0.9%This article: 2.8%Marielle Segarra: 4.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 11.3%Negativity Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 1.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.8%Marielle Segarra: 3.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Halo Effect9.8%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.8%Marielle Segarra: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.5%Primacy Effect0.8%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.2%Marielle Segarra: 14.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 6.1%Appeal to Authority14.2%This article: 3.9%Marielle Segarra: 2.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.5%False Dilemma3.9%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.1%Marielle Segarra: 5.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 4.4%Hasty Generalization9.1%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.6%Marielle Segarra: 0.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.7%Bandwagon0.6%This article: 4.3%Marielle Segarra: 4.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 6.6%Appeal to Emotion4.3%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 1.2%Marielle Segarra: 1.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)1.2%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.4%Burden of Proof2.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 1.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.8%Marielle Segarra: 4.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Anecdotal2.8%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.8%Marielle Segarra: 0.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.8%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.9%Marielle Segarra: 2.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.3%Unattributed Quote2.9%This article: 1.6%Marielle Segarra: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection1.6%This article: 1.9%Marielle Segarra: 0.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.1%Biased Writer Voice1.9%This article: 0.5%Marielle Segarra: 7.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.0%Indoctrination0.5%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Marielle Segarra: 1.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.1%

966 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers27%attributed speech701writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Scott • 34 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Scott • 24 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Scott • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center • 32 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Scott • 24 words • 0.0% coverageLife Kit • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Scott • 18 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Scott • 27 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Scott • 19 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Scott • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Scott • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Scott • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Scott • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
32 attributed words12% of attributed speech40% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.3 ptsWriter: 4.3%Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-2.6 ptsWriter: 2.6%Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-1.9 ptsWriter: 1.9%Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-0.7 ptsWriter: 0.7%Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.