Keyword summary
16%4 analyzed articles/videos587 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Strength Training results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 888 hits. Analysis detected 7,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,352 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 5% (34,035 of 35,618 keywords). This Strength Training is better (less manipulative) than 95.60% of the peer group.
Strength Training
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
5%Strength Training (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

4% percentile
02550751004.4% percentile
1.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate