Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ashlee Valentine results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Optimism Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 256 hits . Analysis detected 2,082 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,183 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,359 authors). This Ashlee Valentine is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Ashlee Valentine
Author details
Total words: 3,183
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.8% 7.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 6.9% 6.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Author 7.8%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.9%, sitewide 0.8% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Straw Man: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst