Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,814 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Margaret Cirino results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 1,250 hits . Analysis detected 7,131 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,602 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 33% (4,449 of 6,628 authors). This Margaret Cirino is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group. Margaret Cirino
Author details
Total words: 9,602
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.9% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.8% 8.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 13.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.8%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst