NPR84%

Wolfing down your meals? Here's how to slow down and eat more mindfully 79%

By Marielle Segarra0%

9/11/2023, 7:03:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 37% saturation with 238 hits. Analysis detected 1,261 faulty-reasoning hits from 643 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 69.9% and a BS Rank of 79% (4,791 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 78.10% of the article peer group.

You ever eat so fast that you get hiccups from just like inhaling the meal? 
Or you bite your cheek or tongue because you mistook it for food? 
Yeah, I've done it. 
So how do we slow down and eat more deliberately? 
And what are some techniques we can use to eat at a healthy pace? 
Lilian Cheung, lecturer and director of Mindfulness Research and Practice in the Department of Nutrition at Harvard T.H. 
Chan School of Public Health, shares helpful tips on how to eat more mindfully. 
That's when you use your senses to enjoy the food, notice how it makes you feel and take time to express gratitude for your meal. 
This practice "encourages us to make choices that are satisfying and nourishing to the body. 
And as we become more aware of our eating habits, we can take steps towards behavior that will benefit not only ourselves, but also our environment," she says. 
Benefits of mindful eating 
Research has shown that mindful eating has had positive impacts on certain populations. 
One study from 2022 found that incorporating mindful eating into a weight-loss program helped reduce stress, anxiety and depression among adults with obesity. 
Another study from 2019 found that mindfulness eating training improved psychological well-being in pregnant women  and its effects appeared to be maintained 8 years later. 
So how do you eat more mindfully? 
Cheung shares 6 tips. 
1. 
Use mealtime as a moment for reflection 
Cheung shares an invocation she learned from the late Buddhist monk Thích Nhất Hanh called "The Five Contemplations," outlined in his book Savor: Mindful Eating, Mindful Life. 
She says that reciting these lines before meals have helped her practice mindful eating. 
2. 
Take at least 20 minutes to finish your meal 
Very often we find ourselves eating while doing something else, says Cheung  and that can make us eat faster than we normally would. 
When you sit down to eat, spend about 20 minutes doing so. 
"It takes about that time for your body to get the signal to the brain that you are full," she adds. 
3. 
Put that phone away 
Remove all distractions while you eat. 
They can interfere with your ability to enjoy your food and notice when you are full. 
"Allocate time to eat and only eat," says Cheung. 
"Make sure your cell phone is face down and you're not going to be responding to any messages that come through." 
4. 
Notice all the little details about your food 
You might wonder how to spend 20 whole minutes eating a sandwich. 
Cheung says one way to slow down is to engage your senses and think through all the details about your meal. 
"Ask yourself: what's on my plate? 
How hungry am I today? 
Is it too salty?" 
she says. 
Notice the smell, the texture and whatever other senses that arise as you eat. 
5. 
Portion out food you might munch on mindlessly 
Cheung suggests putting a small amount of snack food, like potato chips, in a separate bowl to help avoid mindless munching. 
"If you have a whole bag of chips, it is really challenging to stop after six or eight chips," she says. 
"We love the taste, we love the crispiness and we just keep getting it from the bag, especially when we're looking at our cell phone or watching a TV program and are distracted." 
Portioning out these foods can help you eat less at a healthier pace. 
6. 
Actually chew 
If you're inhaling your food you're probably not chewing it. 
And chewing is an important part of digestion, says Cheung. 
It helps "break up the foods so it's easier for absorption." 
Look at each bite before popping it into your mouth, acknowledge what you're eating and "chew, chew, chew," she adds. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 13.1%Marielle Segarra: 2.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.4%Confirmation Bias13.1%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 2.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.0%Marielle Segarra: 2.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.8%Availability Heuristic9.0%This article: 1.6%Marielle Segarra: 2.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic1.6%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 17.6%Marielle Segarra: 2.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.4%Overconfidence Bias17.6%This article: 3.9%Marielle Segarra: 7.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 11.1%Framing Effect3.9%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 1.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.6%Marielle Segarra: 3.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.6%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.4%Marielle Segarra: 4.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.4%Optimism Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Marielle Segarra: 4.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 11.3%Negativity Bias5.8%This article: 0.6%Marielle Segarra: 0.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%Self-Serving Bias0.6%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Marielle Segarra: 1.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%In-Group Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.2%Marielle Segarra: 3.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Halo Effect7.2%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.6%Marielle Segarra: 0.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.7%Recency Bias7.6%This article: 1.9%Marielle Segarra: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.5%Primacy Effect1.9%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.4%Marielle Segarra: 14.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 6.1%Appeal to Authority13.4%This article: 1.4%Marielle Segarra: 2.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.5%False Dilemma1.4%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.6%Marielle Segarra: 5.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 4.4%Hasty Generalization10.6%This article: 1.9%Marielle Segarra: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Red Herring1.9%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.6%Marielle Segarra: 4.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 6.6%Appeal to Emotion0.6%This article: 3.9%Marielle Segarra: 0.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.9%Begging the Question3.9%This article: 24.1%Marielle Segarra: 1.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)24.1%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 1.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 4.4%Marielle Segarra: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Composition/Division4.4%This article: 12.3%Marielle Segarra: 4.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Anecdotal12.3%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.3%Marielle Segarra: 2.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.3%Unattributed Quote2.3%This article: 1.6%Marielle Segarra: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection1.6%This article: 1.2%Marielle Segarra: 0.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.1%Biased Writer Voice1.2%This article: 37.0%Marielle Segarra: 7.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.0%Indoctrination37.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Marielle Segarra: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Marielle Segarra: 1.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.3%

643 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker30%attributed speech448writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageLilian Cheung • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageLilian Cheung • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageLilian Cheung • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageLilian Cheung • 9 words • 100.0% coverageLilian Cheung • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageLilian Cheung • 6 words • 100.0% coverageLilian Cheung • 5 words • 100.0% coverageLilian Cheung • 4 words • 100.0% coverageLilian Cheung • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageLilian Cheung • 21 words • 0.0% coverageLilian Cheung • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageLilian Cheung • 11 words • 0.0% coverageLilian Cheung • 20 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Lilian Cheung

99%flagged-word coverage
195 attributed words100% of attributed speech99% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Indoctrination-5.3 ptsWriter: 38.6%Lilian Cheung: 33.3%33.3%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.7 ptsWriter: 4.7%Lilian Cheung: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-3.3 ptsWriter: 3.3%Lilian Cheung: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.2 ptsWriter: 2.2%Lilian Cheung: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-1.8 ptsWriter: 1.8%Lilian Cheung: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.