Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,727 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Life Kit results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Anecdotal, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 2,281 hits. Analysis detected 10,659 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,093 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,510 of 16,562 topics). This Life Kit is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group.
Life Kit
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 11,093
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.5% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 16.8%16.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 20.6%20.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 20.6%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos