Topic summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,591 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Self Improvement results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 2,113 hits . Analysis detected 12,317 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,807 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 16% (13,934 of 16,562 topics). This Self Improvement is better (less manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group. Self Improvement
Topic details
Total words: 17,807
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles17.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst