Author summary
9%4 analyzed articles/videos1,008 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katie Livermore results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 296 hits. Analysis detected 1,307 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,032 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 32% (6,139 of 8,908 authors). This Katie Livermore is better (less manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
Katie Livermore
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
32%Katie Livermore (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,032
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

31% percentile
025507510031.1% percentile
1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.5%0.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate