Publication summary
10% 24 analyzed articles/videos 9,680 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Statesman Journal results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 2,151 hits . Analysis detected 13,701 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,590 analyzed words across 24 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.7% and a BS Rank of 6% (526 of 557 publications). This Statesman Journal is better (less manipulative) than 94.40% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 41,590
Article count: 24
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.6% percentile 0.7% BS Score24 analyzed articles41.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst