Author summary
50% 2 analyzed articles/videos 587 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dianne Lugo results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 357 hits . Analysis detected 1,727 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,994 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 52% (4,274 of 8,882 authors). This Dianne Lugo is worse (more manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group. Dianne Lugo
Author details
Total words: 2,994
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 11.9%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Middle Ground: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst