Author summary
16%2 analyzed articles/videos894 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anastasia Mason results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Begging the Question, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 273 hits. Analysis detected 1,640 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,576 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 34% (5,922 of 8,883 authors). This Anastasia Mason is better (less manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group.
Anastasia Mason
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
34%Anastasia Mason (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,576
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

33% percentile
025507510033.3% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.2%7.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos