Topic summary
89%4 analyzed articles/videos2,986 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Workers' Rights results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 2,370 hits. Analysis detected 17,492 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,331 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (11,278 of 16,562 topics). This Workers' Rights is better (less manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510031.9% percentile
2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles17.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.6%12.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.5%12.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 4.6%4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate