Author summary
53% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,899 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natascha Elena Uhlmann results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 576 hits . Analysis detected 3,974 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,697 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 42% (3,696 of 6,325 authors). This Natascha Elena Uhlmann is better (less manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group. Natascha Elena Uhlmann
Author details
Total words: 5,697
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.6% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.1% 10.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.6% 3.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst