Author summary
0% 11 analyzed articles/videos 6,964 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Arun Venugopal results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 3,794 hits . Analysis detected 35,702 faulty-reasoning hits from 36,404 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,685 of 6,628 authors). This Arun Venugopal is better (less manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group. Arun Venugopal
Author details
Total words: 36,404
Article count: 11
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.3% percentile 2.0% BS Score11 analyzed articles36.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.6% 9.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.4% 10.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.2% 3.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst