Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,189 analyzed words
BS Summary: These visuals by Anna Watts results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 1,692 hits . Analysis detected 7,107 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,756 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 35% (4,131 of 6,359 authors). This visuals by Anna Watts is better (less manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group. visuals by Anna Watts
Author details
Total words: 8,756
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.0% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst