Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These David Michaels results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 1,028 hits . Analysis detected 4,096 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 6,296 authors). This David Michaels is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. David Michaels
Author details
Total words: 7,580
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.6% 13.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.9% 8.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 0.2% 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst