Topic summary
⁠94%3 analyzed articles/videos2,822 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Women results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 1,460 hits. Analysis detected 13,231 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,653 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (7,088 of 16,562 topics). This Women is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
Women
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,653
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.2% percentile
3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.1%15.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.1%12.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.6%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Nature: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos