Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,187 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lucy Sherriff results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Nature , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 651 hits . Analysis detected 4,865 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,748 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,343 of 6,382 authors). This Lucy Sherriff is worse (more manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group. Lucy Sherriff
Author details
Total words: 4,748
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.3% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.3% 9.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Author 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.7% 13.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.8% 6.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Nature: Author 9.6%, sitewide 0.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst