BBC Future0%
Women were never meant to give birth on their backs 68%
By Lucy Sherriff0%
4/5/2026, 9:10:27 AM
BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 276 hits. Analysis detected 2,191 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,187 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 61.6% and a BS Rank of 68% (6,998 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 68.00% of the article peer group.
It's usually more dangerous for women to give birth lying down, so why do they?
It's all because of a Frenchman who decided it was more convenient – for men.
For thousands of years, across the world, women tended to give birth in an upright position – whether kneeling as per Cleopatra, using birthing stools and chairs, or squatting.
In fact, squatting can enlarge the pelvic diameter by at least 2.5cm (1in), while working with gravity makes it far easier to give birth.
So why do so many women today give birth on their backs?
"There is a generalised ignorance amongst professions and pregnant women about the physiology of birth," says Janet Balaskas, founder of the Active Birth Centre in the UK, and author of a number of books detailing how mothers can take control of their birth experience.
In 1982, Balaskas published an "active birth manifesto" that became the central tenet of her organisation.
"Throughout the world, and for thousands of years, women have spontaneously laboured and given birth in some form of upright or crouching positions," the manifesto reads.
"Whatever the race or culture… the same upright positions predominate."
Most women in post-industrial countries are confined to hospital in recumbent positions, Balaskas says.
"This practice is illogical, making birth needlessly complicated and expensive, turning a natural process into a medical event and the labouring woman into a passive patient," she argues.
"No other species adopts such a disadvantageous position at such a crucial time."
Other experts agree.
In fact, giving birth lying down is a "relatively modern phenomenon", Hannah Dahlen, professor of midwifery at Australia's Western Sydney University, wrote in a 2013 op-ed for The Conversation.
Pregnancy as 'illness'
It's only in the past 300 to 400 years that women have been largely giving birth on their backs.
They can thank a French man named François Mauriceau.
He claimed that the reclining position would be both more comfortable for the pregnant woman and more convenient for the male physician attending to her (there was already a movement emerging to dispense of midwives and instead have male surgeons present at births).
Mauriceau viewed pregnancy as an illness.
In his 1668 book The diseases of women with child and in child-bed, Mauriceau advised: "The best and surest is to be delivered in their bed, to shun the inconvenience and trouble of being carried thither afterwards."
However, some scholars argue that the change in birthing position may actually be due to another Frenchman who lived the same time as Mauriceau – King Louis XIV.
"Since Louis XIV reportedly enjoyed watching women giving birth, he became frustrated by the obscured view of birth when it occurred on a birthing stool, and promoted the new reclining position," wrote Lauren Dundes, a professor of sociology at McDaniel College in Maryland, US, in her 1987 paper on the evolution of birthing positions.
"The influence of the king's policy is unknown, although the behaviour of royalty must have affected the populace to some degree," she added.
"Louis XIV's purported demand for change did coincide with the changing of the position and may well have been a contributing influence."
Regardless of how giving women birth on their backs came about, the trend stuck, much to the detriment of their birthing experience.
"Birth has become institutionalised with options such as home birth – which is more conducive for many women wanting a physiological or 'natural' birth – declining," says Balaskas.
Proven by science
The main reason women have given birth in upright positions for so many thousands of years is simple: gravity.
A baby has to travel downwards through the birthing canal, and gravity is beneficial to the process.
It has been shown that left to their own devices, women will instinctively lean forward during labour – not backwards – adopting positions such as squatting, leaning forward on their hands and knees, or leaning against a low piece of furniture.
A 2013 review of 25 studies involving more than 5,200 women noted that other important outcomes for women who gave birth upright and mobile rather than lying down in bed included "a reduction in the risk of Caesarean birth, less use of epidural as a method of pain relief, and less chance of their babies being admitted to the neonatal unit".
The review did note that more studies were needed for women in high risk groups – some studies have shown an increase in blood loss in upright birth positions.
Labouring upright and giving birth upright have advantages for both the mother and baby – Hannah Dahlen
Upright birthing positions have also been found to decrease the amount of time a woman is in labour.
"Labouring upright and giving birth upright have advantages for both the mother and baby," wrote Dahlen in 2013.
She listed a number of benefits, including more efficient contractions, less maternal pain, fewer forceps, vacuum births and episiotomies, as well as better oxygenation of the baby in the mother's uterus, as the aorta is not compressed by the uterus.
In 2011, Dahlen and her colleagues conducted a study on women in labour to understand whether the birth setting impacted the position women adopted while giving birth.
They looked at two settings – birth centres, where supportive equipment such as balls, birth stools and bean bags were available, and delivery wards, where a medical hospital bed was the only option.
They found the women in birth centres were far more likely to adopt upright positions during the first and second stage of labour compared to a delivery ward setting – 82% of women did so in the birth centres compared to 25% in delivery wards.
There is now awareness in Western countries of the concept of active birth, says Balaskas – an approach that promotes the mother's ability to move freely and instinctively during labour, and adopt upright positions, rather than lying on her back tethered to machines and monitors.
However caesarean rates continue to rise "alarmingly", she says.
"In the UK active birth has influenced change in maternity services such as the option of midwife-led birth centres," she adds, noting these are usually within hospitals and custom-designed to give women freedom of movement and access to a birth pool.
"This did not exist 50 years ago."
Guidelines from the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice) advise that women in labour "should be discouraged from lying supine or semi-supine in the second stage of labour and should be encouraged to adopt any other position that they find most comfortable".
As ever, knowledge is power, and the more women are informed about their birthing choices, the more comfortable they will be in choosing what feels right for them.
"Public education about birth options will always be useful," says Eileen Hutton, a midwife turned academic who runs the midwifery education programme at Canada's McMaster University and author of several papers on birthing.
"A look at the portrayal of birth in popular literature, television and film will quickly demonstrate how the birthing process is misrepresented.
Providing a counterbalance could only be helpful."
Speakers
6speakers44%attributed speech665writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice
97%flagged-word coverageJanet Balaskas
215 attributed words41% of attributed speech79% writer coverage
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.