Topic summary
⁠30%4 analyzed articles/videos4,686 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Body results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 2,182 hits. Analysis detected 16,467 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,560 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (12,935 of 16,129 topics). This Human Body is better (less manipulative) than 80.20% of the peer group.
Human Body
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 20,560
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

20% percentile
025507510019.8% percentile
1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles20.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 10.6%10.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos