Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,779 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Marshall results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Optimism Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 1,632 hits . Analysis detected 12,444 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,116 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,691 of 6,628 authors). This Chris Marshall is better (less manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group. Chris Marshall
Author details
Total words: 15,116
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles15.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 10.8% 10.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.3%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 10.8%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.4%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst