Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos3,779 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Marshall results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 1,632 hits. Analysis detected 12,444 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,116 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,691 of 6,628 authors). This Chris Marshall is better (less manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group.
Chris Marshall
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
30%Chris Marshall (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 15,116
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

29% percentile
025507510029.2% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles15.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.1%5.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.3%3.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 10.8%10.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.3%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Author 10.8%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.4%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos