Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,517 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ruchika T. Malhotra results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Self-Serving Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 1,052 hits . Analysis detected 7,745 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,551 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 88% (851 of 6,628 authors). This Ruchika T. Malhotra is worse (more manipulative) than 87.20% of the peer group. Ruchika T. Malhotra
Author details
Total words: 4,551
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.2% percentile 5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.5% 9.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 23.1% 23.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 13.2% 13.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 16.6% 16.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 11.9% 11.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 9.8% 9.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 9.5% 9.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.9% 6.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Author 23.1%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Author 19.2%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 16.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 13.2%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Author 11.9%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.8%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Personal Incredulity: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst