Author summary
97%1 analyzed article/video118 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Storm Newton results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 31.1% saturation with 110 hits. Analysis detected 621 faulty-reasoning hits from 354 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.3% and a BS Rank of 95% (334 of 6,529 authors). This Storm Newton is worse (more manipulative) than 94.90% of the peer group.
Storm Newton
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
95%Storm Newton (selected)11%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 354
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

95% percentile
025507510094.9% percentile
10.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles354 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 31.1%31.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.0%13.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 12.4%12.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 12.7%12.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 10.2%10.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 11.3%11.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 15.0%15.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.0%13.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Author 6.2%6.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Author 31.1%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Author 13.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 13.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 15.0%, sitewide 8.1%Status Quo Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Author 12.4%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 10.2%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Author 6.2%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos