Topic summary
47% 8 analyzed articles/videos 3,503 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Windows 11 results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Anecdotal , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 2,330 hits . Analysis detected 21,911 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,680 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (9,681 of 15,988 topics). This Windows 11 is better (less manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group. Windows 11
Topic details
Total words: 21,680
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.5% percentile 2.5% BS Score8 analyzed articles21.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.0% 10.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst