ZDNET57%

Windows Search just got a faster, cleaner overhaul - how to try it today 12%

By Lance Whitney38%

7/14/2026, 12:54:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 6 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.2% saturation with 242 hits. Analysis detected 446 faulty-reasoning hits from 728 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 29% and a BS Rank of 12% (18,636 of 21,133 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 88.20% of the article peer group.

ZDNET's key takeaways 
The new Windows 11 Search is cleaner, clearer, and smarter. 
The new Search is available in the latest Windows Insider build. 
It could reach all Windows 11 users within the next few months. 
The built-in Windows 11 Search tool is key to helping you track down files, apps, settings, and other items when you're not sure where to look. 
But the current design of the Search window throws too much stuff at you, making it feel crowded and cluttered. 
Now Microsoft has finally redesigned the Search window to be cleaner, clearer, and more helpful. 
Currently rolling out to the Experimental channel in the latest Windows 11 Insider build, the new Search window has been pared down dramatically. 
Instead of displaying trending searches and other useless information, it now shows you just a list of suggested searches. 
Each item is identified by name and category, so you can easily tell whether it's an app or a setting. 
Selecting one of the items opens the app directly or takes you to the specific setting. 
Also: Your Windows 11 PC might be hiding a 500GB storage bug - how to check 
Run a few searches, and the next time you open the Search window, you'll see a list of your most recent searches so you can quickly return to any of them. 
But the layout itself stays sparse, keeping you focused just on the search or results you need. 
Thankfully, Microsoft is also cutting back on its usual sales pitches. 
The current Search window is typically crowded with hooks for top apps, AI tools, and other promotions. 
The new window dispenses with all that. 
Even better, you should now see the most relevant responses to your search ahead of any related products and promotions. 
You can even tweak the results to remove certain items. 
Head to Settings, select Privacy and Security, and then click Search. 
Here, you're able to choose whether to include web results and Microsoft Store suggestions alongside the results for local files, folders, apps, and settings. 
Even if you opt to include web searches and Microsoft Store suggestions, local results will take priority when they're more relevant. 
But you don't necessarily want to limit the results to just local content. 
In those cases, Search will display cloud-based and connected files when they prove to be a stronger match. 
Also: Windows questions? 
How Copilot can analyze your PC settings now 
Getting the right results also promises to be easier. 
Accidentally submit your search term with a typo, a missed letter, or an extra letter, and Windows should still be able to find it for you. 
Type a word like "utlook," and Search will realize you meant to type "Outlook." 
Even just searching for two characters will dig up relevant results. 
Type characters such as "zo," for example, and Search will show you the zoom settings for the built-in Magnifier tool. 
I took the new Search for a spin and found it a refreshing change from the current look and layout. 
Search also feels faster and smarter, helping me more quickly find what I need. 
How to try the new Search 
To check out the new Search, you must be running the Windows 11 Insider build with the channel set to Experimental. 
Even then, the new Search may not appear. 
On my Insider build, I had to enable the feature flag for this one. 
To do that, head to Settings, select Windows Update, and then click Windows Insider Program. 
Select Feature flags, check the one for "Refined Windows Search," and set it to Enabled. 
Also: Microsoft's new Windows 11 recovery tool is the ultimate Undo button - how to enable it 
"You've been asking for search that is faster, more relevant, and easier to use -- whether you're opening an app, finding a file, or changing a setting," Microsoft said in its Monday blog post. 
"Because the Windows Search Box is where many people start, we focused first on making results more dependable, easier to scan, and clearer before you click." 
With the new Search in the Experimental channel, when might it arrive for all Windows 11 users? 
That's tough to say. 
But if the feature passes muster after the Insider testing, we could see it roll out within the next few months. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 3.7%ZDNET: 2.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 1.2%ZDNET: 1.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 3.4%ZDNET: 3.2%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.5%ZDNET: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 1.9%ZDNET: 3.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Lance Whitney: 2.4%ZDNET: 4.0%Framing Effect2.3%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 2.2%ZDNET: 1.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.2%ZDNET: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.3%ZDNET: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 11.8%Lance Whitney: 8.6%ZDNET: 5.1%Optimism Bias11.8%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.6%ZDNET: 1.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Lance Whitney: 5.1%ZDNET: 4.7%Negativity Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 1.2%ZDNET: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.3%ZDNET: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.2%ZDNET: 0.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 4.6%ZDNET: 3.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 2.3%ZDNET: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 1.1%ZDNET: 1.5%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.1%ZDNET: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 1.5%ZDNET: 4.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.7%ZDNET: 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 4.4%ZDNET: 6.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.3%ZDNET: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.2%ZDNET: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 1.6%ZDNET: 1.9%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.9%ZDNET: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.1%ZDNET: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.1%ZDNET: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.2%ZDNET: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.6%Lance Whitney: 10.5%ZDNET: 4.8%Anecdotal6.6%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.1%ZDNET: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 1.1%ZDNET: 2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.3%ZDNET: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.9%ZDNET: 1.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.5%ZDNET: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 33.2%Lance Whitney: 9.0%ZDNET: 6.4%Biased Writer Voice33.2%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 3.3%ZDNET: 4.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lance Whitney: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Lance Whitney: 2.6%ZDNET: 7.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.9%

728 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers8.7%attributed speech665writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageZDNET • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageMicrosoft • 34 words • 0.0% coverageMicrosoft • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Microsoft

0%flagged-word coverage
60 attributed words95% of attributed speech43% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Biased Writer Voice-36.4 ptsWriter: 36.4%Microsoft: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.1 ptsWriter: 2.1%Microsoft: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.