Topic summary
⁠23%2 analyzed articles/videos1,058 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Well-Being results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Halo Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 732 hits. Analysis detected 4,294 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,890 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (14,995 of 16,559 topics). This Well-Being is better (less manipulative) than 90.60% of the peer group.
Well-Being
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,890
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

9% percentile
02550751009.4% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos