Author summary
65% 1 analyzed article/video 1,058 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marianna Pogosyan Ph.D. results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Anecdotal , and False Dilemma , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 439 hits . Analysis detected 2,118 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,174 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (4,233 of 6,628 authors). This Marianna Pogosyan Ph.D. is better (less manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group. Marianna Pogosyan Ph.D.
Author details
Total words: 3,174
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.1% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.8% 13.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.0% 8.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.0%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Straw Man: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst