Dad's Link Golf Club helps busy dads with fellowship 22%

By Maddie Connors0%

6/16/2026, 10:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Halo Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 161 hits. Analysis detected 1,353 faulty-reasoning hits from 929 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 35.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (16,514 of 21,181 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the article peer group.

To understand the gravitational pull toward golf, consider the sport as a sequence of problems. 
Aaron Singleton, a skilled player in the Dads Link Golf Club, is playing particularly well today at Palos Verdes Golf Course, having just hit two back-to-back birdies. 
But even on the shots that fly into a grassy oblivion, he smiles. 
“Golf is 18 different holes. 18 different chances to solve a problem,” he says. 
“Each hole presents a different problem. 
Each shot is a different problem.” 
According to Singleton, this wisdom that players inherit on the golf course  especially resilience and patience  translates to fatherhood. 
Singleton, who has a 3-year-old son, is part of a growing group of fathers who participate in the Dads Link Golf Club. 
The club is part of the region's golf boom; Southern California Golf Assn. is estimated to have one of the largest memberships in the country, with over 200,000 golfers. 
Ian Davis is the founder of Los Angeles’ Dads Link Golf Club. 
Each month, he invites fathers to enjoy golf together to focus on fellowship, fatherhood and their well-being. 
“This has grown in a way that I couldn’t have imagined,” says Davis, who works as a wellness coach with an emphasis in mindfulness and meditation. 
He started the club in 2023 on the East Coast before relocating it to Los Angeles in January 2024, where the club hosts an annual Father’s Day tournament and various golf clinics. 
At the driving range, Davis leads the group through “a grounding practice” that involves stretching and deep breathing. 
Member Ose Akhile, a personal trainer, follows up with stretching and other warm-up exercises. 
For many of the men, golf has become a rediscovered hobby. 
Singleton returned to the sport after playing it as a teenager. 
“I’m looking forward to getting better,” he says. 
Club member Darius Ingram, father of 3-year-old daughter, says that reconnecting with the game has allowed him to prioritize his own well-being. 
“I used to play golf recreationally. 
Now, I do it for mental stability," he says. 
Ian Monteilh, who is new to the group and has two daughters ages 11 and 15, says the outing provides camaraderie that was missing from his life. 
“It’s a community that I didn’t have. 
I’m blessed to be around like-minded men with no pressure,” he says. 
“Even if we’re having a rough day on a golf course, there’s camaraderie.” 
Once considered a predominantly white sport, golf is now being reshaped by a new generation of Black players and other players of color, including many of the fathers in Dads Link Golf Club. 
In 2024, 25% of golfers across courses nationally were Black, Asian and Latino, marking the most diverse era in the sport’s history, according to the National Golf Foundation. 
“It’s a lot less pretentious  more diverse, more access for all different types of people,” says Ingram, who noticed a shift in golfing culture in recent years. 
Despite Tiger Woods’ storied career as one of the sport’s most impactful athletes, Black men remain underrepresented in top tournaments. 
Ingram partly attributes Black men’s interest in golf to renewed interest from other professional athletes. 
Star athletes like Michael Jordan and Steph Curry  who also happen to be dads  are skilled golfers. 
“There are a lot of people who play their main sport, and they play golf when they retire,” says Ingram. 
Rappers like Schoolboy Q and DJ Khalid have also become interested in the sport, adding to its cachet. 
The benefits of the groups are apparent, explains Akhile, who has three daughters, ages 6, 7 and 9. 
“I’m outside  fresh air, sunshine, a break for my family. 
I get to decompress,” he says. 
Describing himself as a “Caribbean baby,” he explains that the ocean waves have a hypnotic effect on him. 
As the golfers move along the Palos Verdes course, the ocean stretches beyond them. 
“Nature helps a lot with stress relief. 
There’s a lot of green grass and quiet out here. 
I love my child, but it’s hard to hear her yell, ‘Dad!’ 
every three seconds,” says Singleton. 
During the game, he stays calm while a squirrel approaches him. 
“Me and nature are one with each other,” he says. 
Behind him, a baby coyote prances into the fog. 
Singleton adds that in the chaos of fatherhood, friendships occasionally fall to the wayside. 
“There’s so much to do. 
Everyone separated. 
It’s beneficial to have a group text, a fellowship like this, where you can hear someone going through the same thing as you,” Singleton says. 
Akhile agrees. 
“These are probably the only guys that understand the day-to-day stressors and pressures of my life,” he says. 
After finishing nine holes, the men enjoy breakfast burritos. 
They joke that they will begin ranking the golf courses in the L.A. area by the quality of their breakfast burritos. 
Meanwhile, Davis leads the group through a conversation about fatherhood. 
Each month he chooses one dad to be the focus. 
This morning that’s Ingram. 
He speaks on being a father and how it relates to golf. 
“I’m not as good as I want to be, so there’s frustration there,” Ingram says, referring to the challenges of parenting. 
He adds that to "right things" he doesn't like about himself, he focuses on how his efforts could result in his daughter becoming a better version of him. 
The men offer encouragement as birds circle above. 
The sun pierces through the fog. 
Monteilh looks up and jokes: “The only birdies I saw today were in the sky.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.6%Maddie Connors: 1.9%Daily Pilot: 2.9%Confirmation Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Maddie Connors: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Maddie Connors: 2.9%Daily Pilot: 3.5%Availability Heuristic5.3%This article: 3.6%Maddie Connors: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic3.6%This article: 0.0%Maddie Connors: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Connors: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Maddie Connors: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 7.5%Framing Effect1.8%This article: 0.0%Maddie Connors: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.4%Maddie Connors: 0.6%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Status Quo Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Maddie Connors: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.8%Maddie Connors: 2.4%Daily Pilot: 3.6%Optimism Bias5.8%This article: 0.0%Maddie Connors: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Maddie Connors: 1.4%Daily Pilot: 7.7%Negativity Bias5.7%This article: 2.3%Maddie Connors: 1.5%Daily Pilot: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%Maddie Connors: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Connors: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%Maddie Connors: 3.5%Daily Pilot: 1.7%In-Group Bias6.2%This article: 0.0%Maddie Connors: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.6%Maddie Connors: 8.7%Daily Pilot: 5.1%Halo Effect9.6%This article: 0.0%Maddie Connors: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Connors: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.0%Maddie Connors: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Recency Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Connors: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 1.9%Maddie Connors: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Maddie Connors: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Connors: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.9%Maddie Connors: 2.2%Daily Pilot: 4.9%Appeal to Authority8.9%This article: 0.0%Maddie Connors: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Connors: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Connors: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 16.6%Maddie Connors: 7.9%Daily Pilot: 4.4%Hasty Generalization16.6%This article: 0.0%Maddie Connors: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.0%Maddie Connors: 1.5%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Bandwagon2.0%This article: 5.5%Maddie Connors: 1.4%Daily Pilot: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion5.5%This article: 1.5%Maddie Connors: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Begging the Question1.5%This article: 12.2%Maddie Connors: 3.4%Daily Pilot: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.2%This article: 0.0%Maddie Connors: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.9%Maddie Connors: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Burden of Proof1.9%This article: 7.6%Maddie Connors: 1.9%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Appeal to Nature7.6%This article: 4.5%Maddie Connors: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Composition/Division4.5%This article: 17.3%Maddie Connors: 7.5%Daily Pilot: 2.8%Anecdotal17.3%This article: 0.0%Maddie Connors: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.2%Maddie Connors: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.2%This article: 0.0%Maddie Connors: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Connors: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 1.3%Maddie Connors: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Personal Incredulity1.3%This article: 0.0%Maddie Connors: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Connors: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.5%Maddie Connors: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Unattributed Quote1.5%This article: 0.8%Maddie Connors: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.8%This article: 0.0%Maddie Connors: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 5.2%Maddie Connors: 1.3%Daily Pilot: 1.5%Indoctrination5.2%This article: 0.0%Maddie Connors: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Connors: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Maddie Connors: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.4%

929 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers39%attributed speech564writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Singleton • 14 words • 100.0% coverageAaron Singleton • 6 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Singleton • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageIan Davis • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Singleton • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageDarius Ingram • 6 words • 0.0% coverageDarius Ingram • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageIan Monteilh • 7 words • 0.0% coverageIan Monteilh • 12 words • 0.0% coverageIan Monteilh • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageNational Golf Foundation • 28 words • 0.0% coverageDarius Ingram • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDarius Ingram • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageOse Akhile • 18 words • 0.0% coverageOse Akhile • 11 words • 0.0% coverageOse Akhile • 6 words • 0.0% coverageOse Akhile • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Singleton • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Singleton • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Singleton • 5 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Singleton • 2 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Singleton • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageOse Akhile • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageDarius Ingram • 21 words • 0.0% coverageDarius Ingram • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageIan Monteilh • 15 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Ose Akhile

100%flagged-word coverage
71 attributed words19% of attributed speech70% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Indoctrination-8.5 ptsWriter: 8.5%Ose Akhile: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -7.3 ptsWriter: 7.3%Ose Akhile: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.2 ptsWriter: 1.2%Ose Akhile: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.