Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Maddie Connors results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Anecdotal , and In-Group Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 325 hits . Analysis detected 2,176 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,716 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Maddie Connors is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Maddie Connors
Author details
Total words: 3,716
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Composition/Division: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst