Author summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,257 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katherine Ott results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 647 hits . Analysis detected 3,614 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,028 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ā 37% (4,179 of 6,628 authors). This Katherine Ott is better (less manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group. Katherine Ott
Author details
Total words: 5,028
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.0% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.9% 12.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst