Topic summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,449 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Weight Loss results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 1,163 hits . Analysis detected 12,726 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,992 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 28% (11,325 of 15,689 topics). This Weight Loss is better (less manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group. Weight Loss
Topic details
Total words: 15,992
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles16K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst