Topic summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos3,449 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Weight Loss results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 1,163 hits. Analysis detected 12,726 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,992 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 28% (11,325 of 15,689 topics). This Weight Loss is better (less manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group.
Weight Loss
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510027.8% percentile
2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles16K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate