Topic summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,812 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wedding results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Availability Heuristic , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 845 hits . Analysis detected 6,951 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,884 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (13,127 of 15,702 topics). This Wedding is better (less manipulative) than 83.60% of the peer group. Wedding
Topic details
Total words: 12,884
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.4% percentile 1.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles12.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst