Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Caitlin Hornik results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Halo Effect, and Anecdotal, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 175 hits. Analysis detected 658 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,636 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,359 authors). This Caitlin Hornik is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Caitlin Hornik
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Caitlin Hornik (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,636
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 10.7%10.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 6.3%6.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 1.2%1.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 10.7%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos