Topic summary
67% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,168 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wearables results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 2,393 hits . Analysis detected 20,454 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,106 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (9,438 of 15,753 topics). This Wearables is better (less manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group. Wearables
Topic details
Total words: 19,106
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.1% percentile 2.5% BS Score7 analyzed articles19.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 12.5% 12.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.8% 11.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst