Author summary
37% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,588 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nina Raemont results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 1,590 hits . Analysis detected 10,575 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,251 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 36% (4,081 of 6,365 authors). This Nina Raemont is better (less manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group. Nina Raemont
Author details
Total words: 13,251
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.0% 12.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 7.9%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst