ZDNET58%

I wore the world's first HDR10 smart glasses, and they can easily replace my living room TV 81%

By Kerry Wan0%

2/6/2026, 2:47:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 30 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 28.9% saturation with 197 hits. Analysis detected 2,173 faulty-reasoning hits from 682 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 72.7% and a BS Rank of 81% (4,169 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 81.00% of the article peer group.

CES this year was all about personal computing that was happening on your face. 
Whether it was smart glasses, XR headsets, or other weird gadgets that companies want to normalize us into wearing, the point was clear: how we consume content goes beyond phones and TVs now. 
Also: CES 2026: These 7 smart glasses caught our eye - and you can buy this pair now 
One pair of glasses that left the biggest impression on me was RayNeo's Air 4 Pro, which the company touts as the world's first HDR10-enabled smart glasses, with dual-layer OLED screens and Bang & Olufsen-tuned side speakers. 
Together, you're looking at a convincing frontrunner for on-the-go multimedia consumption. 
At the base level, the RayNeo Air 4 Pro is a pair of extended reality glasses, meaning they can be connected to a phone, PC, or even a gaming console to mirror (or fully replace) the display. 
Like competing offerings from Xreal, Viture, and Rokid, the RayNeo glasses are well-optimized for multimedia viewing, thanks to a tinted visor that enhances the color and brightness of their projections. 
Also: Best of CES 2026 Awards: Official Winners List (CNET) 
It certainly helps that the RayNeo Air 4 Pro support swappable prescription lenses (including -8.00) and weigh the same as their predecessor, the RayNeo Air 3s Pro, at 76 grams. 
That's about par for the course for XR glasses, but at least they're not getting any heavier. 
I wore them briefly during a demo and found the sizing and weight distribution to be just right. 
The true test is when you're watching hours-long movies. 
That's also because the RayNeo Air 4 Pro distances itself from competing wearables with its HDR10-enabled projection and Bang and Olufsen-tuned speaker system. 
The former allows users to visualize a wider range of brightness and color than traditional displays, such as details that are often lost in overlit environments or dimmer scenes. 
"While many wearable displays promise a large screen, they often fall short on contrast, color consistency, and stability," Li Hongwei, CEO of RayNeo Innovation, tells ZDNET. 
Supporting this universal standard of picture quality brings the RayNeo Air 4 Pro closer to traditional TVs, projectors, and other devices. 
Also: These smart glasses beat the Meta Ray-Bans for me with useful features and a cheaper price 
As intrigued as I am by the glasses' display quality, I'm just as invested in their new speakers. 
Co-branded "tuning" is a marketing stunt as old as time; we've seen such partnerships appear on smartphones, laptop speakers, cars, and more -- and the resulting audio performance is often hit-or-miss. 
However, after recently testing the Xreal One Pro, which features Bose-tuned field speakers, I'm a believer in smart glasses. 
The enhanced bass and directional output should result in a more immersive listening experience overall. 
RayNeo hasn't shared information regarding the Air 4 Pro's pricing and availability, but considering the existing Air 4 model costs about $400 in China and the Air 3s Pro costs $300 in the US, I'd expect the latest model to be just slightly more expensive. 
One last thing 
RayNeo says it'll also launch the X3 Pro Project eSIM soon, which takes the recently launched pair of AR glasses and implements built-in 4G connectivity -- though it's more to gauge market interest. 
"Currently a concept device, the RayNeo X3 Pro Project eSIM showcases what we believe is the key difference for next-generation AR -- these are glasses that can connect to the internet and make calls on their own, without a smartphone," says Li. 
Also: I've tested several pairs of smart glasses at CES 2026 - this one nails both price and performance 
ZDNET tested the RayNeo X3 Pro late last year and found the smart glasses to be fairly capable, thanks to their built-in display and direct access to Gemini for voice assistance. 
However, the overall endurance and comfort made them less ideal for everyday usage. 
Here's to hoping that giving the glasses eSIM support makes those drawbacks a little more forgivable. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 24.6%Kerry Wan: 5.8%ZDNET: 2.9%Confirmation Bias24.6%This article: 6.6%Kerry Wan: 3.5%ZDNET: 1.7%Anchoring Bias6.6%This article: 20.8%Kerry Wan: 4.7%ZDNET: 3.1%Availability Heuristic20.8%This article: 4.4%Kerry Wan: 1.0%ZDNET: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic4.4%This article: 0.0%Kerry Wan: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%Kerry Wan: 5.3%ZDNET: 3.2%Overconfidence Bias6.6%This article: 12.3%Kerry Wan: 4.5%ZDNET: 4.2%Framing Effect12.3%This article: 0.0%Kerry Wan: 0.0%ZDNET: 1.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.5%Kerry Wan: 0.8%ZDNET: 0.7%Status Quo Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Kerry Wan: 0.7%ZDNET: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 24.5%Kerry Wan: 10.5%ZDNET: 5.2%Optimism Bias24.5%This article: 7.2%Kerry Wan: 1.8%ZDNET: 1.3%Pessimism Bias7.2%This article: 6.5%Kerry Wan: 1.8%ZDNET: 4.5%Negativity Bias6.5%This article: 7.6%Kerry Wan: 4.3%ZDNET: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias7.6%This article: 0.0%Kerry Wan: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Wan: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Wan: 0.8%ZDNET: 0.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Wan: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 28.7%Kerry Wan: 11.5%ZDNET: 3.9%Halo Effect28.7%This article: 0.0%Kerry Wan: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Wan: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.6%Kerry Wan: 2.9%ZDNET: 1.5%Recency Bias5.6%This article: 2.1%Kerry Wan: 1.2%ZDNET: 0.4%Primacy Effect2.1%This article: 0.0%Kerry Wan: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Wan: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Wan: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 28.9%Kerry Wan: 9.9%ZDNET: 4.7%Appeal to Authority28.9%This article: 4.8%Kerry Wan: 0.5%ZDNET: 1.5%False Dilemma4.8%This article: 2.3%Kerry Wan: 1.0%ZDNET: 0.6%Slippery Slope2.3%This article: 0.0%Kerry Wan: 1.0%ZDNET: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 27.3%Kerry Wan: 12.9%ZDNET: 6.5%Hasty Generalization27.3%This article: 0.0%Kerry Wan: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 4.8%Kerry Wan: 0.6%ZDNET: 0.5%Bandwagon4.8%This article: 2.6%Kerry Wan: 2.2%ZDNET: 2.0%Appeal to Emotion2.6%This article: 3.1%Kerry Wan: 2.0%ZDNET: 0.7%Begging the Question3.1%This article: 8.8%Kerry Wan: 1.4%ZDNET: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.8%This article: 0.0%Kerry Wan: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.3%Kerry Wan: 0.1%ZDNET: 0.2%Burden of Proof1.3%This article: 0.0%Kerry Wan: 0.3%ZDNET: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Wan: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 22.1%Kerry Wan: 5.3%ZDNET: 4.9%Anecdotal22.1%This article: 0.0%Kerry Wan: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 23.9%Kerry Wan: 5.7%ZDNET: 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)23.9%This article: 0.0%Kerry Wan: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.5%Kerry Wan: 0.5%ZDNET: 0.2%Middle Ground2.5%This article: 0.0%Kerry Wan: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Wan: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Wan: 0.4%ZDNET: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Wan: 2.3%ZDNET: 0.9%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 3.8%Kerry Wan: 0.3%ZDNET: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection3.8%This article: 5.4%Kerry Wan: 12.0%ZDNET: 6.8%Biased Writer Voice5.4%This article: 4.8%Kerry Wan: 1.8%ZDNET: 3.9%Indoctrination4.8%This article: 0.0%Kerry Wan: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Wan: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 12.0%Kerry Wan: 16.4%ZDNET: 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…12.0%

682 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers15%attributed speech583writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageLi Hongwei • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageLi Hongwei • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageZDNET • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Li Hongwei

100%flagged-word coverage
68 attributed words69% of attributed speech96% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Quote-first Misdirection+38.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Li Hongwei: 38.2%38.2%Attempt to Sell a Product -14.1 ptsWriter: 14.1%Li Hongwei: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-6.3 ptsWriter: 6.3%Li Hongwei: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-5.7 ptsWriter: 5.7%Li Hongwei: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.