Topic summary
69% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,962 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Smart Glasses results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 3,800 hits . Analysis detected 25,932 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,474 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 35% (10,305 of 15,770 topics). This Smart Glasses is better (less manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group. Smart Glasses
Topic details
Total words: 22,474
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.7% percentile 2.4% BS Score7 analyzed articles22.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 16.9% 16.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.9% 11.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 0.5% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst