Topic summary
52% 24 analyzed articles/videos 18,758 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Innovation results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Optimism Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 6,314 hits . Analysis detected 77,758 faulty-reasoning hits from 87,412 analyzed words across 24 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (13,606 of 15,569 topics). This Innovation is better (less manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group. Innovation
Topic details
Total words: 87,412
Article count: 24
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score24 analyzed articles87.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst