Author summary
6% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,906 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mack DeGeurin results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Overconfidence Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 550 hits . Analysis detected 5,323 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,328 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 17% (5,290 of 6,359 authors). This Mack DeGeurin is better (less manipulative) than 83.20% of the peer group. Mack DeGeurin
Author details
Total words: 9,328
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.8% percentile 1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst