Author summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video585 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Wille results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 389 hits. Analysis detected 2,012 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,755 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (1,027 of 6,365 authors). This Matt Wille is worse (more manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group.
Matt Wille
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠84%Matt Wille (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,755
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

84% percentile
025507510083.9% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 22.2%22.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.4%4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 11.8%11.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 15.7%15.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 11.3%11.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 22.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 15.7%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 11.8%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 11.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 9.5%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos