Author summary
73% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,103 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kyle Barr results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.6% saturation with 1,529 hits . Analysis detected 7,386 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,339 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,444 of 6,628 authors). This Kyle Barr is worse (more manipulative) than 78.20% of the peer group. Kyle Barr
Author details
Total words: 5,339
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.2% percentile 4.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 28.6% 28.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.6% 5.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.8% 11.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 28.6%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.5% Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst