Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,266 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wealth-Tax results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 672 hits . Analysis detected 5,395 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,798 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 71% (4,893 of 16,559 topics). This Wealth-Tax is worse (more manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group. Wealth-Tax
Topic details
Total words: 3,798
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.5% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 17.7% 17.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 14.5% 14.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 15.8% 15.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 14.2% 14.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.8%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Primacy Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.9% Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst